The current zeitgeist of Human Rights
advocacy primarily rests with two major NGO or non-governmental agencies. They
are Amnesty International and Human Rights Network. I belong to AI which has not
recognized my event which is prima facie the worst human rights event in the
United States twenty years running. I hope that this new site will inspire
persons to not only read but respond. Any deprivation of a biological system
will eventually deprive this entity until death.
In this light one can state that at least
these three cases are above ground. If one wishes to have their issue posted or
advocated time and resources considered please email:
The use of logical fallacies is a key component in the process and support of
the in continuo abuse. It would benefit all if one were to become familiar with
basic logic. Formal logic based on true values assigned to antecedent and
consequent phrases or predicate calculus is superior to informal fallacies.
Regardless this site
It is imperative that persons begin to
file complaints to the competent authorities. Under the Color of Law against
code enforcement in the main are handled by the FBI. There is a contact for
Under the Color of authority complaints at their website.
Section 242. Deprivation of rights under
color of law
Whoever, under color of any law, statute,
ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any
State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of
any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the
Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments,
pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason
of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or
both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of
this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened
use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this
title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results
from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include
kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt
to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined
under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both,
or may be sentenced to death.
Court
Hearings Regarding Demolition of Krishna Temple
in Kazakhstan
Salton City
CA
Dateline 11-20-2008
Hearings of the case about
demolition of the only Hare Krishna temple in
Kazakhstan continue
At the session that took place on November 17,
2008, the Karasai district court found that the
buildings of the Society for Krisna
Consciousness had been constructed and
passed commissioning lawfully.
The plaintiff, Hakim of the Karasai district,
did not present any documents to support the
prosecution case both this time and at the
previous hearings.
The Karasai district hakim demands in his plaint
that the buildings of the Society for Krishna
Consciousness should be declared illegal and
therefore demolished.
However witness E. Abdykalykov, who sold the
land with a house and a barn to members of the
Society for Krishna Consciousness in 1999,
testified in court that it was him who
constructed all those buildings, not the Hare
Krishnas as the prosecution claims. The
buildings were constructed on the strength of
authorization documents.
Another witness, an architect of the Karasai
district, R. Elamanov, testified in the court
that he had examined the buildings of the
Krishnas in
2001 and signed the act of putting them into
service in accordance with the juridical norms.
Thus the house and the barn were accepted for
usage in conformity with the law, while the
prosecution claims that it was a result of an
error.
The attempt of the Karasai district hakim to
declare the Krishnas' buildings illegal and
demolish them leads to the destruction of the
only Hare Krishna temple in Kazakhstan. This
will be the final act in the planned campaign
for the liquidation of the Society for Krishna
Consciousness.
For the 4 years of trials the authorities of the
Karasai district have destroyed 26 homes of the
faithful and confiscated 47 hectares of land
which was transferred to the national land
reserve without any compensation.
The next court session is scheduled for Tuesday,
November 25, 11:30.
The court address: Tole Bi St. 52, Kaskelen.
Tel. of the court clerk: 8 (72771) 2-10-30.
Judge Mr. Taken Shakirov.
Please accept my humble obeisance’s. All glories
to Srila Prabhupada.
We have continued our efforts in Kazakhstan and it
seems that the saga is nearing an unfavorable conclusion.
In 2001 the Kazakh government issued a decree that
our temple building and barn were suitable for usage. This summer
they annulled that decree.
Now they have called our members to court. The
case will focus on the “demolition of illegal building and forced
eviction from the property.”
As a final effort we have started a letter
campaign to the President of Kazakhstan. We did this in the
beginning of the crisis and we are still on the property four years
later.
We are humbly requesting you to take a moment to
fax this letter to two offices of the Kazakhstan government:
1. To the Kazakhstan Embassy in London.
+442075848481
2. To the Administration of the President of
Kazakhstan, Mr. NA Nazarbayev
+77172745631
I was just in Warsaw at the OSCE meeting.
Kazakhstan is presently under strong international criticism for
their failure at democratic reform in light of their 2010
Chairmanship of OSCE. Our issue was consistently raised by the
United States, the Holy See (Vatican), and numerous respected human
rights organizations.
In the midst of international criticism there is a
ray of hope that if protest reaches Kazakhstan at this moment the
government may act differently in this issue.
Thank you very much for taking a moment to help
and for the support you have all given us during this crisis.
Your servant,
BB Govinda Swami
SEND TEXT BELOW
October 12, 2008
Dear President Nazarbayev,
We would like to acknowledge your leadership of
the great nation of Kazakhstan since independence. Your country has
become a place of inter-ethnic peace and religious tolerance.
We find it troubling that in your nation the
Krishna Religion has faced many difficulties.
Presently, the Karasai District Court of Almaty
Province is initiating court procedures that will result in the
demolition of the only Krishna Religion temple in the nation of
Kazakhstan.
If this demolition takes place it will be a
blemish on the face of your beautiful nation.
We are requesting Your Excellency to uphold the
dignity of your nation by ordering the closure of the current legal
procedures.
We also request that the various departments of
your government will work fairly to establish an equitable resolve
to this crisis.
United Nations Organization — Permanent Mission
(Ambassador cross-accredited to Cuba) 866 United Nations Plaza,
Suite 586
New York, NY 10017 phone: (1212)230-19-00,
fax: 230-1172
kazakhstan@un.int
www.un.int/kazakhstan
United States of America — Embassy (Washington D.C.)
(Ambassador cross-accredited to Canada, Mexico) 1401 16th Street,
N.W.
Washington DC. 20036 phone: (1202)232-54-88
fax: 232-58-45
kazak@intr.net www.kazakhstan-embassy-us.org
United States of America — Consulate (New York) 866 United
Nations Plaza, Suite 586A
New York, NY 10017 phone: (1212)888-30-24,
fax: 888-30-25
kzconsulny@un.int
Kazakh Krishnas Face 11th Hour
Big Pine
CA
Dateline 10-1-2008
10 acre dumpsite offered for 116 acre farm
On
September 11, 2008 the assistant Hakim of Almaty province, S.
Mukanov, informed the directors of the Society for Krishna
Consciousness that the court has accepted the proposal of the
Karasai district Hakim to declare the Society's buildings legally
invalid. Mukanov stated that the Kazakh authorities expect this
proposal to be sustained by court, and that the Temple and other
buildings of the society would be declared illegal, demolished, the
Society's members forcibly evicted.
In August the Krishna Society received the resolution of the Hakim
of the Karasai District stating that the Kazakh government’s 2001
act of acceptance of the Society’s buildings into official usage had
been annulled. The Hakim’s resolution was not on government
letterhead, had no official document number, had no signatures, and
had no official stamps.
The directors of the Krishna Society had first seen this document in
a meeting with the assistant Karasai Hakim in July 2008. During the
meeting the Krishna Society directors were not accompanied by their
advocate. Thus, despite being forced by the Hakim, they refused to
sign the document.
The assistant Hakim angrily responded to their denial by saying, "Be
prepared for new court cases."
On July 30, 2008 the Council for Connections with Religious
Organizations of the Kazakh Government held a meeting in Astana to
discuss the situation with the Society for Krishna Consciousness.
At that time, an attempt was again made by the chairman of the
National Religious Committee, A. Dozhan to force to the Krishna
Society to sign an agreement to relocate to unusable land in the
Iliy district of Almaty Province.
The directors of the Society have rejected this land, which is an
active garbage dump. The land is unsuitable for constructing a place
of worship, has no essential communications, devoid of drinking or
irrigation water.
As an alternative to the Kazakh government proposal, the Krishna
Society has appealed that the government allow them to use the land
where their temple and other buildings are situated. This land was
legally purchased, privatized, and developed at huge expense by the
Society’s members and cultivated for 9 years.
According to Article 17 of the Law on Freedom of Faith and Religious
Organizations in Republic of Kazakhstan, religious organizations
have a pre-emptive right to receive the religious buildings with the
adjacent territory.
The assistant Hakim of Almaty province, S. Mukanov, responded that
there would be no other concessions. He stated, "We have already
filed a claim for demolishing the remaining buildings.”
The Karasai government has initiated trials against the Society for
Krishna Consciousness since 2005. This has resulted in the
demolition of 26 homes of Hindu practitioners in 2006 and 2007.
The court cases have also resulted in the confiscation of 116 acres
of the Society's land. This prime property was transferred to the
Karasai district land reserve without compensation to the Society.
The proposed compulsory Temple demolition and forced eviction will
be the final stage of the Kazakh government’s campaign to destroy
the largest established center of the Krishna Society in Central
Asia.
Barack Obama’s emergence from relative obscurity
as a local or state figure to an international persona is taking on
a mythical proportions. This is also in equivalent to stating he is
being developed within a bubble. I am one day senior in age to
Barack Obama being born August 3, 1961 in Roswell, New Mexico. This
as well as the largest battle on American soil orchestrated by a
foreign power still is being censored.
In degree the era of Irrationalist Presidents
begins officially on June 17, 1987 in Los Angeles Police Department
and radiates to the Delaware State Police in Kent County, Delaware.
This is the 200th Anniversary of the United States.
Barack Obama would just be approaching his 27th birthday.
He has therefore has had ample time to deliberate and consider the
consequences of his actions.
This time period establishes a system of a Perfect
Dictator for the United States.
I am currently writing outside a meadow in
Westwood, California. The area is heavily chemicall contaminated. The lakes and
surface streams are heavily damaged. The contamination began in
1987 but was heavily escalated on February 12, 2007 in Earp, Arizona.
This is on the Colorado River which supplies a great deal of the
drinking water in Southern California.
None of the previous presidents of the era or
sworn official has had the courage or sense of duty to defend the
constitution, homeland or natural persons in residence in the
country.
Cambridge Laws School is alleged to be the
authorship. The event and planning is said to occur by handing off such
planning to Scotland Yard and then LAPD over several decades. Part of the support of this
attack is that of a Gay Militia. The cell(s) of LAPD are basically
provocateurs. I have analyzed that they are scapegoats who have
attempted to scapegoat the Delaware State Police or any other
foolish persons who will be their accomplices.
I have successful rebutted their attempts to Gay
Bait my person. I am a spiritually conservative Gaudiya Vaishnava and
my orientation does not permit LGBT behavior or identity.
Barack Obama, if he loses will fall to the
obscurity of Michael Dukakis, Bob Dole, and John Kerry. If he wins
he will be able to further his mythology but with greater risks at stake.
Due to his age he becomes the stronger target for me within
constitutional boundaries. To my knowledge Oberley, Beau Biden, and
Deputy State Police Superintendent George Seifert of Delaware are now in their
forties.
Bill and Hillary Clinton, Al Gore, Dan Qualye, and
George W. Bush are just past their 55th year of age.
So then the rebuttal of an ad hominem redherring/strawman
attack is a diversion from the DIRECT PROSECUTION on a manifest
chemical assault over 20 years in continuo!
Barack Obama is more qualified as subject for the
study of psychopathy and lifespan development than being president.
It appears his life and my own have been organized under impure
synchronicity. The impure area being organized by Cambridge Law
School and being held under electronic surveillance by LAPD and the
local police where Barack has lived.
Any drug use Barack and I have had would have been
most likely orchestrated by police and informants.
Totalitarianism and Dystopia are two themes on
this small discourse that will ensue.
David Nollmeyer
Westwood CA
8-15-2008
Wake Up and Die...
Westwood
CA
Dateline 8-4-2008
Aleksandr Solzenhenitsyn has died August 3, 2008 in Russia. I spent
the day acknowledging my 47th birthday. I have not seen any comments
from Barack Obama or John McCain. I read his book The Gulag
Archpileago in the tenth grade. It was interesting that the Capitol
School District made one read The Good Earth, Pearl S. Buck and
Caesar Rodney High School gave 1984 and Animal Farm, George Orwell
to task. In degree what Solzenhnitsyn did not say in his life he can
help indirectly by being dearly departed to add focus on the
American School of The Perfect Dictator.
Aleksandr Isayevich Solzhenitsyn Russian: Алекса́ндр Иса́евич
Солжени́цын, Russian pronunciation (December 11, 1918 – August 3,
2008) was a Russian novelist, dramatist and historian. Through his
writings, he made the world aware of the Gulag, the Soviet labour
camp system, and for these efforts, Solzhenitsyn was both awarded
the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1970 and exiled from the Soviet
Union in 1974. He returned to Russia in 1994. That year, he was
elected as a member of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts in
the Department of Language and Literature. He was the father of
Ignat Solzhenitsyn, a well-known conductor and pianist. He died at
home after years of declining health on August 3, 2008.
During World War II, he served as the commander of an artillery
unit in the Red Army, was involved in major action at the front, and
was twice decorated. In February 1945, while serving in East
Prussia, he was arrested for writing a derogatory comment in a
letter to a friend, N. D. Utkevich, about the conduct of the war by
Josef Stalin, whom he called "the whiskered one", "Khozyain" (The
Master) and "Balabos", (Odessa Yiddish for "boss").[11] He was
accused of anti-Soviet propaganda under Article 58 of the Soviet
criminal code, paragraph 10, and of "founding a hostile organisation"
under paragraph 11. Solzhenitsyn was taken to the Lubyanka prison in
Moscow, where he was beaten and interrogated. On 7 July 1945, he was
sentenced in his absence by a three-man tribunal of the Soviet
security police (NKGB) to an eight-year term in a labour camp, to be
followed by permanent internal exile. This was the normal sentence
for most crimes under Article 58 at the time.
The first part of Solzhenitsyn's sentence was served in several
different work camps; the "middle phase," as he later referred to
it, was spent in a sharashka, special scientific research facilities
run by Ministry of State Security, where he met Lev Kopelev, paragon
of Lev Rubin in his book The First Circle, published in the West in
1968. In 1950, he was sent to a "Special Camp" for political
prisoners. During his imprisonment at the camp in the town of
Ekibastuz in Kazakhstan, he worked as a miner, bricklayer, and
foundryman. His experiences at Ekibastuz formed the basis for the
book One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich. While there he had a
tumor removed, although his cancer was not then diagnosed.
From March 1953, Solzhenitsyn began a sentence of internal exile
for life at Kok-Terek in southern Kazakhstan. His undiagnosed cancer
spread, until, by the end of the year, he was close to death.
However, in 1954, he was permitted to be treated in a hospital in
Tashkent, where he was cured. These experiences became the basis of
his novel Cancer Ward and also found an echo in the short story "The
right hand". It was during this decade of imprisonment and exile
that Solzhenitsyn abandoned Marxism and developed the philosophical
and religious positions of his later life; this turn has some
interesting parallels to Dostoevsky's time in Siberia and his quest
for faith a hundred years earlier. Solzhenitsyn gradually turned
into a philosophically-minded man in prison. He repented for what he
did as a Red Army captain and in prison compared himself with the
perpetrators of the Gulag ("I remember myself in my captain's
shoulder boards and the forward march of my battery through East
Prussia, enshrouded in fire, and I say: 'So were we any better?'")
His transformation is described at some length in the fourth part of
The Gulag Archipelago ("The Soul and Barbed Wire").
During his years of exile, and following his reprieve and return
to European Russia, Solzhenitsyn was, while teaching at a secondary
school during the day, spending his nights secretly engaged in
writing. In his Nobel Prize acceptance speech he wrote, "during all
the years until 1961, not only was I convinced I should never see a
single line of mine in print in my lifetime, but, also, I scarcely
dared allow any of my close acquaintances to read anything I had
written because I feared this would become known."
This criminal
complaint sent to the FBI today is overdue. John
Ashcroft was the United States Attorney General from
2000 to 2004. The FBI is authorized to investigate
Homeland Security issues.
Complaint
I, David
Nollmeyer bring a criminal complaint against former
United States Attorney General John Ashcroft for
violating the due process rights by engaging in de
facto and negligent activities that are a chemical
assault against the United States citizens and
territories. The attack is orchestrated by a Gay
Militancy run by a cell of LAPD California officers.
During his tenure between the dates of 2001 and 2004
John Ashcroft as the chief code enforcement officer
of the United States obstructed justice as CHAPTER
73—OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
§ 1513. Retaliating against a witness, victim, or
an informant, CHAPTER 11B—CHEMICAL WEAPONS§ 229.
Prohibited activities in that he is a willing
accomplice to this in continuo attack which
is ongoing as of July 26, 2008.
Archives
2001 will covers events in Delaware after 9-11. Here
my IV, V, and VIII Amendment rights are being
violated. Intense electronic surveillance run by the
Delaware State Police was unauthorized and including
broadcasting data across public and private media as
tv and radio. As I started to move an escalation
began which would eventually attempt to poison all
that I can, touch, taste, smell, hear, and see. This
again is a CHEMICAL ASSAULT AGAINST THE UNITED
STATES WHEN THE ANTHRAX SCARE WAS ONGOING.
Archives 2003 covers the same manner of incidents
in California in mostly San Luis Obispo County,
California. John Ashcroft is de facto or negligent
in not prosecuting a CHEMICAL ASSAULT AGAINST THE
UNITED STATES AND WHICH HAS LEAD TO A FRAUD IN
AGRICULTURE STANDARDS IN THIS REGION.
Archives 2004 covers CHEMICAL ASSAULT AND ILLEGAL
SURVEILLANCE IN LOMPOC, CALIFORNIA AND SAN LUIS
OBISPO COUNTY.
These event are the worst in th
e
history
of California. It is shocking how law enforcement ie.
Homeland Security officers are engaging in an
CHEMICAL ATTACK on the United States.
Summary
In degree this is a HATE CRIME. I am an orthodox
practicing Gaudiya Vaishnava of Japanese American. I
am supporting pro-heterosexual legislation as
Proposition 8 in California now and in the time
periods of John Ashcroft’s tenure supported
traditional heterosexual marriage.
David
Nollmeyer
General
Delivery,
Westwood CA
96137
Bill of Rights
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their
persons, houses, papers, and effects, against
unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon
probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation,
and particularly describing the place to be
searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital,
or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment
or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases
arising in the land or naval forces, or in the
militia, when in actual service in time of war or
public danger; nor shall any person be subject for
the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life
or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case
to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of
law; nor shall private property be taken for public
use, without just compensation.
Amendment VIII
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor
excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual
punishments inflicted.
CHAPTER 11B—CHEMICAL WEAPONS
§ 229. Prohibited activities
(a) Unlawful Conduct.— Except as provided in
subsection (b), it shall be unlawful for any person
knowingly—
(1) to develop, produce, otherwise acquire,
transfer directly or indirectly, receive, stockpile,
retain, own, possess, or use, or threaten to use,
any chemical weapon; or
(2) to assist or induce, in any way, any person
to violate paragraph (1), or to attempt or conspire
to violate paragraph (1).
(b) Exempted Agencies and Persons.—
(1) In general.— Subsection (a) does not apply to
the retention, ownership, possession, transfer, or
receipt of a chemical weapon by a department,
agency, or other entity of the United States, or by
a person described in paragraph (2), pending
destruction of the weapon.
(2) Exempted persons.— A person referred to in
paragraph (1) is—
(A) any person, including a member of the Armed
Forces of the United States, who is authorized by
law or by an appropriate officer of the United
States to retain, own, possess, transfer, or receive
the chemical weapon; or
(B) in an emergency situation, any otherwise
nonculpable person if the person is attempting to
destroy or seize the weapon.
(c) Jurisdiction.— Conduct prohibited by
subsection (a) is within the jurisdiction of the
United States if the prohibited conduct—
(1) takes place in the United States;
(2) takes place outside of the United States and
is committed by a national of the United States;
(3) is committed against a national of the United
States while the national is outside the United
States; or
(4) is committed against any property that is
owned, leased, or used by the United States or by
any department or agency of the United States,
whether the property is within or outside the United
States.
CHAPTER 73—OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
§ 1513. Retaliating against a witness, victim, or
an informant
(a)
(1) Whoever kills or attempts to kill another
person with intent to retaliate against any person
for—
(A) the attendance of a witness or party at an
official proceeding, or any testimony given or any
record, document, or other object produced by a
witness in an official proceeding; or
(B) providing to a law enforcement officer any
information relating to the commission or possible
commission of a Federal offense or a violation of
conditions of probation [1] supervised release,,[1]
parole, or release pending judicial proceedings,
shall be punished as provided in paragraph (2).
(2) The punishment for an offense under this
subsection is—
(A) in the case of a killing, the punishment
provided in sections
(B) in the case of an attempt, imprisonment for
not more than 20 years.
(b) Whoever knowingly engages in any conduct and
thereby causes bodily injury to another person or
damages the tangible property of another person, or
threatens to do so, with intent to retaliate against
any person for—
(1) the attendance of a witness or party at an
official proceeding, or any testimony given or any
record, document, or other object produced by a
witness in an official proceeding; or
(2) any information relating to the commission or
possible commission of a Federal offense or a
violation of conditions of probation
[1]
supervised release,,[1]
parole, or release pending judicial proceedings
given by a person to a law enforcement officer;
or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this
title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or
both.
(c) If the retaliation occurred because of
attendance at or testimony in a criminal case, the
maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed
for the offense under this section shall be the
higher of that otherwise provided by law or the
maximum term that could have been imposed for any
offense charged in such case.
(d) There is extraterritorial Federal
jurisdiction over an offense under this section.
(e) [2]
Whoever knowingly, with the intent to retaliate,
takes any action harmful to any person, including
interference with the lawful employment or
livelihood of any person, for providing to a law
enforcement officer any truthful information
relating to the commission or possible commission of
any Federal offense, shall be fined under this title
or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.
(e) [2]
Whoever conspires to commit any offense under this
section shall be subject to the same penalties as
those prescribed for the offense the commission of
which was the object of the conspiracy.
Self Advocacy
on Human Rights
Westwood CA
Dateline 7-18-2008
This letter is being
sent to persons with an interest in human rights.
Dear Friend
I have
not emailed many persons regarding the scorched earth chemical
assault in the United
States recently. I am currently in Westwood, CA. The Cub Complex
fire is about 20 miles from where I am now writing. The surface
water in my surrounding vicinity as Lake Almanor is chemically
contaminated.
The water in homes and
businesses are likewise attacked by the police when I am in the
area. The air outside is also sprayed. Many rooms in motels in the
like have been so contaminated with caustic mixtures it would burn
you if touched such. The local creek here is in this state.
This event is the
product of a SINGLE ISSUE TERROR GROUP. This is a Gay Militia which
is irrational. I identify such as Gay Irrationalism and Gay
Know-Nothing. This is a pre-fascist structure. I call such
irrational because it appears that the cognition and morality of
this event is less than living in a fascist state or a slave
condition as had happened in Europe and the United States
previously.
It is impossible to
maintain a logical rational conversation with the Gay Militants from
LAPD. One should research Pathological Lying. This emergent
structure is nurtured by relative morality which is used to
kill off one’s sense of right or wrong, hence conscience.
This informant
structure appears to be designed out of Cambridge Law School since
the 1930s. This group of planners or rather plotters then allegedly
have engaged Scotland Yard who then entangled LAPD. Activities in
the United States appear to be run from LAPD who then have entangled
the Baltimore PD and the Delaware State Police.
I have been attacked
from an epistemological and axiological point of departure. All that
I can see, hear, taste, touch or smell has become poisoned.
In this regards I am
opening up my attack on the culture of impunity concerning President
Bush, Barack Obama, John McCain, Congress, the Supreme Court, and
Homeland Security.
I pertain to the Vedic
Gaudiya Sampradaya as a ritvik, not diksa follower of His Divine
Grace A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada. There is a strong line
of poisonings in this line from the Gaudiya Math to the present. If
Swamiji was poisoned it appears this could of been facilitated from
the factory line of his Ayurvedic medications. This would appear to
be the work of Scotland and local authorities. Here one has to worry
again for a constructed redherring/strawman.
What is also unique is
that I am one day older than Barack Obama being born 8-3-1961 in
Roswell, New Mexico. It is almost 100 % sure that all the UFO
sightings in this area were orchestrated by British and American
intelligence to cover up secret testing of what at that time would
be advanced aircrafts and possibly rockets. My father served in the
USAF as a MP and consequentially I was born there by arrangement.
In degree, I am asking
all to confront the authorities on my and others behalf. I will be
addressing all public officials as needed to the FBI with criminal
complaints to create a credible record.
It appears
that the time has come to focus most of my effort with the FBI which
is at the federal level. There are at least 42 states that are
directly involved with me present in personemm. This does not
exclude state prosecution. It more than likely is a confrontation
with the lack of performance of state officials regarding duties.
The nature of these actions will be criminal. It also does not
exclude civil complaints at any level.
Engaging the
FBI
Westwood CA
Dateline 7-11-2008
The whole
posture of the culture eternal, natural, and positive law is on it's
head. There is no recognition as to the systematic torture that has
been ongoing for over 20 years. In this regard I am engaging the FBI
with criminal complaints as to why parties have not been charged and
bound over to the courts. Homeland Security has jurisdiction over
all code enforcement officials in the United States. It is clear
that these parties are under the color of law.
The content of
the website is at issue. This region is in the top 10 jurisdiction
for prosecution. Historically there is no manner to explain what has
happened without this area. For private persons these individuals
would have to criminally prosecuted otherwise there is scapegoating
and duplicity.
I am legally
and historically challenging the authorities and the general
population regarding the materials disclosed.
Dear FBI
My name is
David Nollmeyer I am writing to file a CRIMINAL COMPLAINT against
College of the Redwoods, Eureka, California, The Humboldt Sheriff,
and the California Highway Patrol.
I am writing
under duress. There are local wildfires as well as regional chemical
contamination which is a Homeland Security issue.
I am including the entire text of a already self published website:
The information should be read as a criminal complaint. The
following codes are being invoked.
U.S. Code as of: 01/19/04
Section 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or
custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory,
Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any
rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the
Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different
punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an
alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for
the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury
results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if
such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a
dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this
title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death
results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if
such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated
sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, oran
attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for
any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to
death.
652A. General Principle
1) One who
invades the right of privacy of another is subject to liability for
the resulting harm to the interests of the other.
(2) The right of privacy is invaded by:
(a) unreasonable intrusion upon the seclusion of another, as stated
in 652B; or
(b) appropriation of the other's name or likeness, as stated in
652C; or
(c) unreasonable publicity given to the other's private life, as
stated in 652D; or
(d) publicity that unreasonably places the other in a false light
before the public,
as stated in 652E.
652B.
Intrusion upon Seclusion
One who
intentionally intrudes, physically or otherwise, upon the solitude
or seclusion of another or his private affairs or concerns, is
subject to liability to the other for invasion of his privacy, if
the intrusion would be highly offensive to a reasonable person.
I am also stating that intimidating a witness occurs and will use
the 14th amendment to facilitate.
David Nollmeyer
Westwood CA
7-10-2008
Born 8-3-1961
Supreme Court
bans death penalty for child rape
Westwood
CA
Dateline 6-26-2008
This is an issue that I believe is highly
contentious but deserves further deliberation. Both Barack Obama and
John McCain support the capital punishment for certain instances of
child rape. I concur with their stance.
David Nollmeyer
By James Oliphant
WASHINGTON -- A narrowly divided Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that
imposing the death penalty for the rape of a child is
unconstitutional.
In a 5-4 decision, the court overturned a Louisiana law that called
for the death penalty for raping a child under 12, and it removed
from death row a man convicted of attacking his 8-year-old
stepdaughter.
Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote the opinion, saying, in essence,
that the crime, awful as it is, does not merit capital punishment.
"The incongruity between the crime of child rape and the harshness
of the death penalty poses risks of over-punishment and counsels
against a constitutional ruling that the death penalty can be
expanded to include this offense," Kennedy wrote.
He was joined by Justices John Paul Stevens, David H. Souter, Ruth
Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer.
Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois, the presumptive Democratic nominee
for president, criticized the court's decision at a Chicago news
conference.
"I have said repeatedly that I think that the death penalty should
be applied in very narrow circumstances for the most egregious of
crimes," he said.
"I think that the rape of a small child, 6 or 8 years old, is a
heinous crime, and if a state makes a decision that under narrow,
limited, well-defined circumstances, the death penalty is at least
potentially applicable, that does not violate our Constitution."
Obama has frequently cited the near-abolishment of the death penalty
in Illinois as one of his top legislative accomplishments.
His probable Republican opponent in the presidential race, Sen. John
McCain of Arizona, also objected.
"Today's Supreme Court ruling is an assault on law enforcement's
efforts to punish these heinous felons for the most despicable
crime," McCain said. "That there is a judge anywhere in America who
does not believe that the rape of a child represents the most
heinous of crimes, which is deserving of the most serious of
punishments, is profoundly disturbing."
The four members of the court's conservative wing also sharply
criticized the ruling, saying a small but growing number of states
had determined that the rape of a child deserved the death penalty;
they said the court majority was interfering with that judgment.
"The harm that is caused to the victims and to society at large by
the worst child rapists is grave," Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr.
wrote. "It is the judgment of the Louisiana lawmakers and those in
an increasing number of other states that these harms justify the
death penalty."
Alito was joined in his dissent by Justices Antonin Scalia and
Clarence Thomas and Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.
The court in 1977 ruled that the death penalty for rapists was
unconstitutional under the 8th Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual
punishment. That decision involved the rape of a 16-year-old female,
whom the court considered an adult.
More than a decade ago, Louisiana made rape a capital crime if the
victim was younger than 12. The state said it has sought the death
penalty in only five cases, twice obtaining a capital verdict.
Several other states, including Texas, Georgia and South Carolina,
have similar laws, but they require that the assailant have
committed a second, separate offense before the death penalty is an
option.
The defendant in the case on which the court ruled Wednesday,
Patrick Kennedy, has maintained his innocence. He had been offered
life in prison if he pleaded guilty. He refused and was sentenced to
death in 2003.
He and his stepdaughter originally said that two boys assaulted her
in March 1998 in the backyard of their home in Jefferson Parish,
across the Mississippi River from New Orleans. But police found
inconsistencies in Kennedy's story and blood on sheets inside the
home. The girl was badly injured and required surgery.
Kennedy, 43, will still face life in prison with no possibility of
parole. His lawyers plan to appeal his conviction.
Tribune staff writer John D. McCormick in Chicago contributed to
this report.
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court
ruled Thursday that foreign terrorism suspects held at Guantanamo Bay
have rights under the Constitution to challenge their detention in U.S.
civilian courts.
In its third rebuke of the Bush
administration's treatment of prisoners, the court ruled 5-4 that the
government is violating the rights of prisoners being held indefinitely
and without charges at the U.S. naval base in Cuba. The court's liberal
justices were in the majority.
Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing
for the court, said, "The laws and Constitution are designed to survive,
and remain in force, in extraordinary times."
It was not immediately clear
whether this ruling, unlike the first two, would lead to prompt hearings
for the detainees, some of whom have been held more than six years.
Roughly 270 men remain at the island prison, classified as enemy
combatants and held on suspicion of terrorism or links to al-Qaida and
the Taliban.
In Rome, President Bush said,
"We'll abide by the court's decision. That doesn't mean I have to agree
with it."
He said the administration would
review the decision to see if new legislation was warranted.
Ruling could halt first
war-crime trial A lawyer for Osama bin Laden's former
driver said Thursday he would try to stop the first scheduled war-crimes
trial at Guantanamo Bay in light of the Supreme Court's ruling.
Other lawyers are expected to
join in a blizzard of filings to the war-crimes tribunal and to U.S.
federal courts after the ruling Thursday that detainees at Guantanamo
Bay are entitled to habeas corpus, the right to challenge their
detention in civilian court.
Bin Laden's former driver, Salim
Hamdan, has been held at Guantanamo Bay since May 2002, and is one of
only 19 of the roughly 270 men still held who has been charged with a
crime. His military trial was scheduled to be the first.
The Supreme Court ruling
complicates the Bush administration's repeated attempts to put suspected
terrorists before war-crimes tribunals at the U.S. Navy base in
southeast Cuba.
"The entire legal framework
under which Mr. Hamdan was to be tried has been turned on its head,"
Hamdan's lawyer, Navy Lt. Cmdr. Brian Mizer, told The Associated Press.
Mizer said the defense lawyers
can now argue that their clients have the right to confront their
accusers and not incriminate themselves, both of which have been denied
under the Military Commissions Act.
Mizer said he will file a motion
next week also arguing that Hamdan was denied his constitutional right
to a speedy trial. The military judge postponed the Yemeni's June 2
trial pending the Supreme Court ruling, and it is unclear what he will
do now.
Guantanamo opened after
9/11 The administration opened the detention
facility at Guantanamo Bay shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist
attacks to hold enemy combatants.
The prison has been harshly
criticized at home and abroad for the detentions themselves and the
aggressive interrogations that were conducted there.
The court said not only that the
detainees have rights under the Constitution, but that the system the
administration has put in place to classify them as enemy combatants and
review those decisions is inadequate.
The administration had argued
first that the detainees have no rights. But it also contended that the
classification and review process was a sufficient substitute for the
civilian court hearings that the detainees seek.
Vigorous dissents In dissent, Chief Justice John Roberts
criticized his colleagues for striking down what he called "the most
generous set of procedural protections ever afforded aliens detained by
this country as enemy combatants."
Justices Samuel Alito, Antonin
Scalia and Clarence Thomas also dissented.
Scalia said the nation is "at
war with radical Islamists" and that the court's decision "will make the
war harder on us. It will almost certainly cause more Americans to be
killed."
Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth
Bader Ginsburg, David Souter and John Paul Stevens joined Kennedy to
form the majority.
The court has ruled twice
previously that people held at Guantanamo without charges can go into
civilian courts to ask that the government justify their continued
detention. Each time, the administration and Congress, then controlled
by Republicans, changed the law to try to close the courthouse doors to
the detainees.
In addition to those held
without charges, the U.S. has said it plans to try as many as 80 of the
detainees in war crimes tribunals, which have not been held since World
War II.
A military judge has postponed
the first scheduled trial pending the outcome of this case. The trial of
Salim Ahmed Hamdan, Osama bin Laden's onetime driver, had been scheduled
to start June 2.
Presidential candidates John
McCain and Barack Obama also support shutting down the prison.
Drought Declaration Proves Who Governor
Schwarzenegger Is
Westwood
CA
Dateline 6-8-2008
Gov. Schwarzenegger continues to play the game with
reality. Here is the official chronology from the California Homepage.
Here the folly of the Schwarzenegger’s excel sheet policymaking will be
crushed. The chemical despoliation of water resources is unparalleled in
United States or world history. The population of California and this
country is in disgrace for supporting these acts of tyranny.
Statement by Gov. Schwarzenegger on Federal Government’s Declaration of
Emergency for Salmon Fishermen
Gov. Schwarzenegger issued the following statement after U.S. Commerce
Secretary Gutierrez announced that the federal government has declared a
state of emergency, a major step toward providing critical federal
assistance to the salmon industry in California.
“Today’s disaster declaration is long overdue, but there is much more to
accomplish to get the salmon fishermen the relief they deserve. I am
pleased that our efforts, including those by Senators Feinstein and
Boxer, Congressman Mike Thompson and the entire delegations from
California and Oregon, have opened a door to access critically needed
relief for the salmon fishermen and the businesses that depend on a
plentiful fishing season.
“The restricted salmon fishing season along the West Coast has created a
substantial economic hardship to salmon fishermen and our communities
along the coast. Secretary Gutierrez’s decision to declare a state of
emergency allows state officials to pursue assistance for those who rely
on salmon fishing – those who are at risk of losing their boats,
permanently shutting their doors or being forced out of their
livelihoods.
“I am grateful that Secretary Gutierrez has listened to our concerns and
made this important decision to take the initial step toward providing
federal relief to the salmon industry.”
“Secretary Gutierrez has committed to sending his experts to the West
Coast to better understand the situation. I will make every resource
available to demonstrate to them the full extent of this serious
situation.”
Chronology of Relief Efforts by Governor Schwarzenegger for Salmon
Fishermen impacted by the Federal Government’s Restrictions on Salmon
Fishing Season
July 6, 2006 – Federal government declares a state of emergency, a major
step toward providing critical federal assistance to the salmon industry
in California.
July 3, 2006 – Governor Schwarzenegger renewed his call on the federal
government to provide critical relief to salmon fishermen. The Governor
joined Senators Feinstein and Boxer on a conference call with U.S.
Commerce Secretary Gutierrez along with the Governor of Oregon and
several members of California and Oregon's Congressional Delegation
including Congressman Mike Thompson (D-Helena) and Oregon Senators
Gordon Smith (R) and Ron Wyden (D).
June 29, 2006 – Governor Schwarzenegger announced a relief package of
$35 million in grants and loans for salmon fishermen and added three
counties to those in which a state of emergency has been proclaimed,
including San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara and Trinity counties.
June 29, 2006 – Included in the relief package of $35 million, the
Governor added money to the Small Business Expansion Fund, making the
total fund guarantees available nearly $20 million. On June 6, the
Governor The Governor’s proclamation also expanded the number of
eligible participants to include those involved in the salmon
distribution chain, such as bait and tackle shops.
June 29, 2006 – Governor also called for all impacted fishermen to be
reimbursed their commercial salmon fishing license fees, and for next
year's license fees to be waived.
June 26, 2006 – Governor Schwarzenegger sent a letter urging the U.S.
Commerce Secretary to provide assistance to the salmon fishermen.
June 6, 2006 – Governor proclaimed an emergency in 10 California
counties including Monterey, Santa Cruz, San Mateo, San Francisco,
Marin, Sonoma, Mendocino, Humboldt, Del Norte and Siskiyou Counties.
June 6, 2006 – In his proclamation of emergency, the Governor directed
the Department of Finance to appropriate and maintain $778,000 as a
guarantee in the Small Business Expansion Fund, leveraging up to $9.2
million in loans to prevent business insolvencies and the loss of
employment.
(see link for information on existing loan guarantee program)
April 28, 2006 -- Governor Schwarzenegger and Governor Kulongoksi of
Oregon sent joint letters to several members of Congress in support of
efforts made to address the emergency situation posed by the potential
restriction of salmon season.
April 28, 2006 – The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's
Fisheries Services, a division of the U.S. Department of Commerce,
adopted an emergency rule recommended by the Pacific Fisheries
Management Council (PFMC) to restrict salmon fishing.
April 6th, 2006 – the Pacific Fisheries Management Council (PFMC) voted
to recommend restrictions on salmon fishing opportunities for commercial
and recreational anglers along the coasts of California and Oregon.
April 5, 2006 – Governor Schwarzenegger sent a letter to U.S. Commerce
Secretary Carlos Gutierrez requesting federal assistance should salmon
season be closed or restricted. By requesting an official determination
of commercial fishery failure, an analysis of the financial impact and
expedited funding, the Governor's letter laid the groundwork for
economic assistance for the businesses and communities impacted.
October, 2004 – Governors Schwarzenegger and Kulongoski signed the
Klamath River Watershed Coordination Agreement along with the
responsible federal agencies to address the impacts to the fisheries in
the region and to develop a long-term management approach, common vision
and integrated planning associated with the Klamath Basin.
Background: The federal government's conservation effort was predicated
on concerns that Klamath Basin Chinook Salmon that commingle with other
runs of salmon in ocean waters off of California and Oregon have been
declining in abundance, due to poor ocean conditions, drought, water
management issues, disease and the elimination of access to historical
spawning habitat.
Drug Prosecution in the USA
Big
Pine CA
Dateline 5-12-2008
US: ‘Drug War’ Unjust to African Americans
Two National Reports Detail Racial Disparity in Arrests and Imprisonment
(Washington, DC, May 5, 2008) – Ostensibly color-blind, the US “war on
drugs” disproportionately targets urban minority neighborhoods, Human
Rights Watch and The Sentencing Project said in two reports released
today. Although whites commit more drug offenses, African Americans are
arrested and imprisoned on drug charges at much higher rates, the
reports find
In the 67-page report, “Targeting Blacks: Drug Law Enforcement and Race
in the United States,” Human Rights Watch documents with detailed new
statistics persistent racial disparities among drug offenders sent to
prison in 34 states. All of these states send black drug offenders to
prison at much higher rates than whites.
“Most drug offenders are white, but most of the drug offenders sent to
prison are black,” said Jamie Fellner, senior counsel in the US program
at Human Rights Watch and author of “Targeting Blacks.” “The solution is
not to imprison more whites but to radically rethink how to deal with
drug abuse and low-level drug offenders.”
Key findings in the Human Rights Watch report include:
Across the 34 states, a black man is 11.8 times more likely than a white
man to be sent to prison on drug charges, and a black woman is 4.8 times
more likely than a white woman.
In 16 states, African Americans are sent to prison for drug offenses at
rates between 10 and 42 times greater than the rate for whites. The 10
states with the greatest racial disparities in prison admissions for
drug offenders are: Wisconsin, Illinois, New Jersey, Maryland, West
Virginia, Colorado, New York, Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Michigan.
The Sentencing Project’s 45-page study, “Disparity by Geography: The War
on Drugs in America’s Cities,” is the first city-level analysis of drug
arrests, examining data from 43 of the nation’s largest cities between
1980 and 2003. The study found that, since 1980, the rate of drug
arrests in American cities for African Americans increased by 225
percent, compared to 70 percent among whites. Black arrest rates grew by
more than 500 percent in 11 cities during this period; and, in nearly
half of the cities, the odds of arrest for a drug offense among African
Americans relative to whites more than doubled.
“The alarming increase in drug arrests since 1980, concentrated among
African Americans, raises fundamental questions about fairness and
justice,” said Ryan S. King, policy analyst for The Sentencing Project
and author of “Disparity by Geography.” “But even more troubling is the
fact that these trends come not as the result of higher rates of drug
use among African Americans, but, instead, the decisions by local
officials about where to pursue drug enforcement.”
Among The Sentencing Project report’s key findings:
African-American drug arrests increased at 3.4 times the rate of whites
despite similar rates of drug use.
Extreme city variations in drug arrests point to local enforcement
decisions as a prime contributor to racial disparity.
Six cities experienced more than a 500-percent rise in overall drug
arrests between 1980 and 2003: Tucson (887 percent), Buffalo (809
percent), Kansas City (736 percent), Toledo (701 percent), Newark (663
percent), and Sacramento (597 percent).
The Sentencing Project and Human Rights Watch urge public officials to
restore fairness, racial justice, and credibility to drug-control
efforts. They recommend public officials take a number of concrete
steps, including:
Eliminating mandatory minimum sentences and restoring judicial
discretion to sentencing of drug offenders;
Increasing public funding of substance abuse treatment and prevention
outreach to make these readily available in communities of color in
particular;
Enhancing public health-based strategies to reduce harms associated with
drug abuse and reallocating public resources accordingly.
Today’s reports follow in the wake of the March 2008 recommendations of
the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial
Discrimination. The committee urged that US criminal justice policies
and practices address the unwarranted racial disparities that have been
documented at all levels of the system.
On April 11, 2008,
the Hakimat of Almaty Province informed the
directors of the Society for Krishna Consciousness
that on Monday, April 14, the Society will receive a
document that grants them a piece of land in the
Iliysk District of Almaty Province, even though the
Society has never consented to relocate to the
Iliysk District.
On April 5, 2008,
the directors of the Society for Krishna
Consciousness examined the four plots of land that
the authorities of the Iliysk District had offered
to them. None of the offered plots was found to be
fit for the purposes of the religious organization.
All the plots fall into the category of so called
"undesirable land." One of them is situated in a
waterlogged gully, another one is a former hilly
graveyard (for that reason the architectural
department does not recommend landscaping in that
area), the third plot is situated too far from the
city, and the fourth one neighbors the actual
cemetery. All the plots cannot be leveled and are
unfit for house building.
The directors of the Society for Krishna
Consciousness lodged an official protest to the
Provincial Hakim, Serik Umbetov, against the
proposed plots in the Iliysk District.
The question of evicting the Religious Organization
Society for Krishna Consciousness from their
property was raised by the Hakim of Almaty Province
at the meeting in Taldy Korgan on March 25, 2008.
The authorities gave one week to the directors of
the Society for Krishna Consciousness for
considering and accepting the proposal in regard to
the relocation of the religious community to the
land which does not actually meet the needs of the
Society. If the Society did not accept these
conditions, said the officers of GASK (the State
Architectural and Construction Board), they would
open a lawsuit to demolish the Krishna Society's
existing temple and barn.
The legal prosecution against the Society initiated
by the former authorities of the Karasai District
has resulted in the demolition of 26 homes of the
faithful who received no compensation. The Society's
116-acre farmland has been confiscated and returned
to the Kazakh Government Land Reserve.
The abuse of faith based missions throughout the world
continues. This is truly one of the most novel and capricious. ISKCON
itself has just evicted devotees from a Costa Rican farm that also is
in continuo. In co-relation Christians are complaining that Hindu
Nationalists are harassing and intimidating such in Orissa. In Jaganatha
Puri non Indian born pilgrims are refused entry to the temple even
though this is illegal.
Kazakhstan Krishnas Given One Week to
Get Out
By Maxim Varfolomeyev on 30 Mar 2008
On March 25, 2008 the directors of the Krishna Society were summoned to
a meeting organized by the Hakim of Almaty Province. The subject of the
meeting was the imminent eviction of the Religious Organization Society
for Krishna Consciousness from their property in Karasai District.
The Krishna organization was given a period of one week to accept the
government demands to vacate their developed 116 acre farm. The proposed
alternative is a 5-acre plot of undeveloped land in the wilds of Talgar
district. The proposed site is further from Almaty city than their
current location.
The Krishna Society was informed that if does not accept these
conditions, within one week, that the officers of GASK (the State
Architectural and Construction Board), will open a lawsuit to demolish
the Krishna Society's existing temple and barn.
The Krishna Society's project near Almaty is a unique spiritual center
for Kazakhstan and the entire CIS. It serves as the cultural center for
the followers of the Krishna faith in Central Asia.
The three-year prosecution against the Society has resulted in the
demolition of 26 homes of the faithful. The Society's 116-acre farmland
has been confiscated and returned to the Kazakh Government Land Reserve.
During the meeting on March 25th it was announced that the confiscated
land would be subdivided and sold by the government for private villas.
The religious organization will be liquidated when it loses its current
legal address. The followers of the Krishna belief will be deprived of
the opportunity to practice their religion collectively, which is the
main component of freedom of conscience and faith.
A fair and reasonable solution to this conflict would underline
Kazakhstan's commitment in upholding international commitments to human
rights, religious tolerance and ethnic amity. But in this case there is
no element of fairness to be found.
The United States of America is principally a transit
and destination country for trafficking in persons. It
is estimated that 14,500 to 17,500 people, primarily
women and children, are trafficked to the U.S. annually.
1 The U.S. Government is strongly committed
to combating trafficking in persons at home and abroad.
The Trafficking Victims Protection
Act of 2000, enhances pre-existing
criminal penalties, affords new protections to
trafficking victims and makes available certain benefits
and services to victims of severe forms of trafficking.
It also establishes a Cabinet-level federal interagency
task force and establishes a federal program to provide
services to trafficking victims. The U.S. Government
recognizes the need to sustain and further enhance
efforts in order to achieve the goals and objectives of
the Act.
The U.S. Department of State began monitoring
trafficking in persons in 1994, when the issue began to
be covered in the Department’s Annual Country Reports on
Human Rights Practices. Originally, coverage focused on
trafficking of women and girls for sexual purposes. The
report coverage has broadened over the years, and U.S.
embassies worldwide now routinely monitor and report on
cases of trafficking in men, women, and children for all
forms of forced labor, including agriculture, domestic
service, construction work, and sweatshops, as well as
trafficking for commercial sexual exploitation.
Internationally, the U.S. has
initiated many anti-trafficking and development programs
to assist countries to combat this ever-growing
phenomenon. Mandated by the TVPA in 2000, the Office to
Monitor and Combat Trafficking was created in the State
Department (G/TIP Office). The G/TIP Office has provided
millions of dollars in grants to organizations all over
the world to implement programs in order to combat
trafficking. These programs include disseminating
information on the dangers of trafficking, strengthening
the capacity of non-governmental organizations to
protect those groups from abuse and violence, and
outreach and economic opportunity programs for those
most at risk of being trafficked. The U.S. has assisted
countries to enact anti-trafficking legislation, trained
law enforcement officials, prosecutors, border guards
and judicial officers on detecting, investigating, and
prosecuting traffickers, and protecting victims and
provided start-up equipment for new anti-trafficking
police units. The www.HumanTrafficking.org Web
site for East Asia/Pacific countries is a response to a
recommendation of participants at the Asian Regional
Initiative Against Trafficking (ARIAT) meeting in
2000.
Nationally, the US government is
committed to prosecuting traffickers and assisting
persons who have been identified as victims of
trafficking.
In November 2003, the US Congress reauthorized the
Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000.
Every isolated individual and group undergoes a soul-searching
exercise for truth as to why their situation is not being recognized or that no
one individually or collectively has done anything of substance to remedy the
situation.
Currently I waste much time in this psychological workout. My recurring
conclusion is that Man as a species, homo sapiens does not have the
repertoire innately accessible to adapt and solve these contingencies in the
environment.
Can socialization eventually reclaim the loss from nature? Perhaps education and
a culture of excellence is possible but not likely. It appears that an in
continuo degradation of humankind is more likely the offering of a future
outcome.
Super Tuesday is next week and I have been musing that the New Republican
Paradigm will result in the nominee proclaiming that God is Dead. Fiscal
Conservatism has killed God.
I come from a Vedic World View. If the children die before the parents than the
king or government is no good. Over 50 million individuals have been destroyed
under abortion in the United States.
I do no see any encouragement from the Democrats prima facie.
The Failure of
Leadership
Cambria CA
Dateline 1-17-2008
The new year in part will
focus in part for legal and historical accountability from the
so-called leadership. The culture and legal organs of the state
have institutionalized damage which the future will have to
bear. The 2008 Presidential Candidates are histories worst.
President Bush has been targeted and has condoned the worst act
of totalitarianism.
Here in San Luis Obispo
it is a comedy of incompetence as the Gay Militia of LAPD
attempts to build a LBGT showcase through terror. The worst
accurate legal and historical record is being created.
The monetary damage
here will be extreme as.
The attempt to use
Manjari Bhava which is a spiritual rasa or emotion in
Gaudiya Vaishnavism as equivalent to homosexuality is the best
example of exploitation and ignorance. There has been an attack
on vegetarianism which is integral to an spiritual Vedic claim.
Traditional Gaudiya Vaishnavism argues a celibate heterosexual
priesthood, no gambling, alcohol, or drug use as smoking any
form of marijuana.
I pertain to a
conservative line of teaching and will oppose such in my legal
will, directives and estate to support the traditional
heterosexual interpretation of the Vedas which I do follow.
In panorama Christians
have been attacked in Orissa which is a Gaudiya Vaishnava
stronghold. The United States is incompetent for attempting to
sanitize their state sponsored violence.
Amnesty
International has revealed that secret executions have
taken place in Nigeria’s prisons.
Despite the country’s recent assurances that no one has
been executed there “in years”, Amnesty International
has uncovered evidence of at least seven executions in
the last two years. It is feared that more may have
taken place.
All those executed were hanged. They were all convicted
in a Kano state court and their death warrants were
signed by the current Kano state governor, Malam Ibrahim
Shekarau.
Kenneth Ekhone and Auwalu Musa were executed on 30 May
2006, after being convicted by a Robbery and Firearms
Tribunal. They did not have lawyers throughout the
proceedings, nor were they given an opportunity to
appeal against the judgments. Until his death, Auwalu
Musa denied he had anything to do with the crime.
On 15 November 2007, a Nigerian government
representative at the UN spoke about the death penalty
in Nigeria. He stated: “Punishment only comes after
exhaustive legal and judicial processes, including
recourse to the supreme court of the land… It is thus on
record that we have not carried out any capital
punishment in recent years in Nigeria.”
Approximately 700 prisoners are estimated to be on death
row in Nigeria. More than 200 inmates have been on death
row for over ten years, some for over 25 years. Until
now, it had been widely assumed that no executions had
taken place since 2002.
The Nigerian government has been misleading the
international community about the taking of human life.
It must now come clean on its death penalty record.
Amnesty International calls for an immediate moratorium
on all executions in Nigeria.
The concept of a Single Issue Terror Group is becoming a
disturbing concept that is focusing in a constraining but positive manner my
opposition to the ongoing attack in the United States. LAPD are avenging LGBT
History and are ill equipped to perform any positive activities other than
destroy the United States. Both public and civilian populations are informant
based and complicit. A scapegoating purge will most likely attempt to wash the
hands of dead presidents as Ronald Reagan. Due to time and logistic constraints
the following is edited from:
A Military Guide to Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century 15 August 2005
Motivation Categories
Motivation categories describe terrorist groups in terms of their ultimate goals
or objectives. While political or religious ideologies will determine the “how”
of the conflict, and the sort of society that will arise from a successful
conclusion, motivation is the “what”; what the end state or measure of success
is.
Social
Often particular social policies or issues will be so contentious that they will
incite extremist behavior and terrorism. Frequently this is referred to as
“single issue” or “special interest” terrorism. Some issues that have produced
terrorist activities in the United States and other countries are:
• Animal rights
• Abortion
• Ecology/environment
• Minority rights
Networked Structure
Terrorists are now increasingly part of far more indistinct and broader system
of networks than previously experienced. Groups based on religious or
single-issue motives lack a specific political or nationalistic agenda; they
therefore have less need for a hierarchical structure to coordinate the
achievement of their goals. Instead, they can depend and even thrive on loose
affiliation with like-minded groups or individuals from a variety of locations.
General goals and targets are announced, and individuals or cells are expected
to use flexibility and initiative to conduct the necessary action.
Basic Concepts
Networks consist of nodes. A node may be an individual, a cell, another
networked organization, or a hierarchical organization. They may also consist of
parts of other organizations, even governments, which are acting in ways that
can be exploited to achieve the network’s organizational goals.
The effectiveness of a networked organization is dependent on several things.
The network achieves long-term organizational effectiveness when the nodes share
a unifying ideology, common goals or mutual interests. When there is failure to
accept the overall goals of the organization, pieces of the network will drop
out. This is less catastrophic than a splintering within a hierarchical group.
Another difficulty for network organizations not sharing a unifying ideology is
that nodes can pursue objectives or take actions that do not meet the goals of
the organization, or are actually counterproductive. In this instance, the
independence of nodes fails to develop synergy
between their activities or contribute to common objectives.
Networks distribute the responsibility for operations, and provide redundancies
for key functions. The various cells need not contact or coordinate with other
cells except for those essential to a particular operation or function. The
avoidance of unnecessary coordination or command approval for action provides
deniability to the leadership and enhances operational security.
Networks are not necessarily dependent on the latest information technology for
their effect. The organizational structure and the flow of information inside
the organization are the defining aspects of networks. While information
technology can make networks moreeffective, low-tech means such as
couriers and landline telephones can enable networks to operate effectively in
certain circumstances.
Hub or Star and Wheel Nodes communicate with one central node. The central node need not be the
leader or decision maker for the network. A variation of the hub is a wheel
design where the outer nodes communicate with one or two other outer nodes in
addition to the hub. A wheel configuration is a common feature of a financial or
economic network.
Government Affiliation Categories
Categorizing terrorist groups by their affiliation with governments provides
indications of their means for intelligence, operations, and access to types of
weapons. U.S. joint doctrine identifies three affiliations: non-state supported,
state-supported, and state-directed terrorist groups.
• Non-state supported. These are terrorist groups that operate autonomously,
receiving no significant support from any government.
• State-supported. These are groups that generally operate independently but
receive support from one or more governments.
• State-directed. These groups operate as an agent of a government and receive
substantial intelligence, logistic, and operational support from the sponsoring
government.
A Military Guide to Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century 15 August 2005
Sociopaths Lack Guardian Angel
Cambria CA
Dateline 11-8-2007
Kathleen Fackelmann
Leading nativistic criminologist Adrian Raine of University of Pennsylvania
after analyzing research on 1400 persons stated that killers and antisocial
people are more likely to have abnormalities in the prefrontal cortex. This
location in forehead is involved in making moral decisions.
"The prefrontal cortex is like the guardian angel of behavior," stated Raine.
Guido Frank, a University of Colorado-Denver researcher argues that after
analysis of brain scans of aggressive teenage males that abnormalities in the
amygdala may also be prevalent.
These preliminary findings according to Raine are the strongest to link
abnormalities in the brain to violent behavior. Raine also states that proving
brain damage that predisposes one to violence may not be excusable in court.
Raine stated, "We must protect society."
Judge Michael Mukasey Should Not Be Attorney General
Cambria CA
Dateline 11-03-2007
What appeared to be a less than acrimonious vetting
for United States Attorney General became heated when the Bush nominee was
questioned regarding torture and specifically waterboarding. This tactic
comprises of inversion of the detainee and pretending to insert one's head into
a bucket of water to extract information during interrogation. I find the
ticking time bomb scenario poor support or backing for torture.
Here in Cambria California while this theatre goes on in Washington DC there
is a huge problem with the culture of impunity and looking the other way while
acts of harassment are committed with police and authorities looking the other
way. If one would stick one's hand in Santa Ynez Creek that runs through the
village it would burn one's h
