Archives 2006

In the continuum of United States history one of the most prominent aspects in the direction of this nation is the legacy of the president. Since June 17, 1987 manifest censorship has attempted to sanitize the real trajectory of events in-continuo. This would include the records of:

On this date law enforcement agents in Los Angeles Police Department usurped their positions in effect hostaging then President Ronald Reagan whom hesitated to act lending to the creation of the alienation of a private citizen to attack the United States Constitution.

Irrationalism is a form ideology that proceeds from premises that cannot be proved. It can also be based on a folk state. This can be love of the soil or a building block for ethnic nationalism.

The United States Constitution creates a citizen first and then a president. Hence the office is duty bound to uphold the rights of all. Three executive branches are created. They are the executive, legislative, and judicial branches.

What is manifest is the isolation of a citizen defacto from one's constitutional life. This in the proper is the enfranchisement of one's primary rights, or the first nine rights as enumerated in the Bill of Rights. The tenth right simply defers certain rights back to the states. The secondary law was created to uphold the primary law which has precedence. Here irrationality develops as the above named supra, have failed in their duty as the First Citizen to uphold the rule instead choosing their own interest disguised as the will of the majority. This immediately invokes the spectre of Jean Jacque Rousseau's Social Contract. At hand is the classic case of man's individual liberty versus the reign of the civil state. The sovereign is the legal and moral collective. The General Will is the incorporation of the collective nation's will into the state as an artificial corporate person. Here the invertaebration of the General Will from the exposition.

I hold then that Sovereignty, being nothing less than the exercise of the general will, can never be alienated, and that the Sovereign, who is no less than a collective being, cannot be represented except by himself: the power indeed may be transmitted, but not the will.

We can see from this that the sovereign power, absolute, sacred and inviolable as it is, does not and cannot exceed the limits of general conventions, and that every man may dispose at will of such goods and liberty as these conventions leave him; so that the Sovereign never has a right to lay more charges on one subject than on another, because, in that case, the question becomes particular, and ceases to be within its competency.

THE question is often asked how individuals, having no right to dispose of their own lives, can transfer to the Sovereign a right which they do not possess. The difficulty of answering this question seems to me to lie in its being wrongly stated. Every man has a right to risk his own life in order to preserve it. Has it ever been said that a man who throws himself out of the window to escape from a fire is guilty of suicide? Has such a crime ever been laid to the charge of him who perishes in a storm because, when he went on board, he knew of the danger?

The social treaty has for its end the preservation of the contracting parties. He who wills the end wills the means also, and the means must involve some risks, and even some losses. He who wishes to preserve his life at others' expense should also, when it is necessary, be ready to give it up for their sake. Furthermore, the citizen is no longer the judge of the dangers to which the law-desires him to expose himself; and when the prince says to him: "It is expedient for the State that you should die," he ought to die, because it is only on that condition that he has been living in security up to the present, and because his life is no longer a mere bounty of nature, but a gift made conditionally by the State.

Here we must not be frivolous political philosophy and self-preservation are what is laying waste with the positive law reigning as as the controlling suprasystem as gentle abstract turned into battering ram of shrapnel as incompetence and corruption. The inviolable constitution or compact turns now to be identical to the interest of leader. This is a Fuerher Principle when wrought out of it's true nature and ends which is the preservation of Justice for the individual and collective by the power of the state. It may also be a system of leaders as is the present case a Perfect Dictatorship.

It is evident at the present in-continuo that any president elected is no more than a democratically elected tyrant.

http://www.freewebs.com/powereality/presidents.htm

May 2, 2006

Kazakhstan Bulldozes ISKCON Devotees Dacchas
BY: IGOR ROTAR

By Igor Rotar, Forum 18 News Service <http://www.forum18.org>

The long running struggle of Kazakhstan's Hare Krishna community to retain a farm they own – their only commune in the former Soviet Union - has intensified, Forum 18 News Service has learnt, as Almaty regional court has ordered the farm to be confiscated without compensation. "We will contest this decision in the Kazakhstan Supreme Court of Supervision. The situation is critical. Under the law the court bailiffs can come to us at any moment and begin to take the land from us," Rati Mandzhari (Yekaterina Levitskaya), of the Society for Krishna Consciousness, told Forum 18. The commune has long been the target of state attempts to close it down, which the community thinks may be motivated by state intolerance of Hare Krishna devotees and greed for material gain. Other religious minorities in Kazakhstan – such as Protestants – are also experiencing state intolerance of religious freedom.

The long running struggle of Kazakhstan's Hare Krishna community to retain a farm they own on the outskirts of the commercial capital Almaty has intensified, Forum 18 News Service has learnt. On 29 March, Almaty regional court decided to confiscate the farm without compensation. "We will contest this decision in the Kazakhstan Supreme Court of Supervision. The situation is critical. Under the law the court bailiffs can come to us at any moment and begin to take the land from us," Rati Mandzhari (Yekaterina Levitskaya), of the Society for Krishna Consciousness of Kazakhstan, told Forum 18 on 18 April.

The latest reason claimed by the state for confiscating the land is an accusation of forgery, allegedly committed by the former owners – not the current Hare Krishna owners - when the land was bought by the community in 1999. The state alleges that the former owners changed the registered use recorded in the sale contract from 'peasant farm' to 'subsidiary farm'. Under Kazakh law, only the district administration head (akim) has the right to change the registered use of land. The 47.7 hectare [118 acre] farm is the only Hare Krishna commune in the former Soviet Union, and has long been the target of state attempts to close it down (see eg. F18News 14 October 2005 http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=671).

However, Kazakhstan's case against the Hare Krishna devotees breaks the country's own laws. When the current legal action was initiated in May 2005, twice the time within which legal action should be taken (3 years) had already elapsed. Despite this major flaw in the state's case, the Almaty regional court ignored this objection.

"The state is trying to reduce the whole action to a mundane economic dispute. However, it is obvious that the rights of dozens of Kazakh citizens belonging to a religious minority are being crudely violated. In all the court documents the religious adherence of the respondents is emphasised, which is a crude violation of their constitutional rights", Levitskaya of the Hare Krishnas told Forum 18.

She believes the local authorities are annoyed that a Hare Krishna commune is in Kazakhstan. "Some officials in Astana [the capital] have said to me bluntly 'What do you expect - you are the only religious minority association that owns such a large piece of land," Levitskaya told Forum 18. She also thinks that material gain may be motivating Kazakh officials. "It really is a very good and large piece of land. We have put a lot of effort into improving it. It would be very advantageous to acquire such a property." Forum 18 has itself documented state intolerance of the Hare Krishna devotees and their commune's religious freedom (see F18News 14 October 2005 http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=671).

Kazakh officials are reluctant to discuss the case with Forum 18. "It is too soon to say this case is closed. The Hare Krishnas can contest the decision of the regional court. I have been following this case very closely and I talk regularly with the Hare Krishnas. But until the court proceedings are concluded I cannot make any comment," Galaskar Syrybaev, the state Religious Affairs Representative for Almaty region, told Forum 18 on 18 April.

June 26, 2006

Delaware State Police Woes
Arrest made in trooper case; Sergeant resigns from state force
By Drew Volturo, Delaware State News

DOVER - Delaware State Police Sgt. Charles R. Mullett surrendered at Troop 3 near Camden Tuesday and was arrested for allegedly removing various drugs from an evidence locker at the troop during the past three years. Sgt. Mullett, 45, a 19-year state police veteran who was assigned to Troop 3's criminal investigation unit, was charged with 10 counts of unlawfully obtaining possession of a controlled substance and seven other drug-related charges.

He was arraigned at Kent County Superior Court, one day after a Kent County grand jury returned an indictment Monday. Sgt. Mullett was released on $8,500 unsecured bond pending a case review June 27 in Superior Court.Following his arrest, the sergeant resigned from the state police, effective immediately.

Mr. Mullett had been suspended with pay but without police privileges since April 23 when he allegedly requested drug paraphernalia from Bayhealth-Milford Memorial Hospital while in an official capacity.According to the eight-page indictment, Mr. Mullett allegedly removed cocaine, marijuana, methamphetamine and Oxycodone, a pain reliever, between April 2003 and April 2006.

Delaware State Troopers' Association president Sgt. Vincent P. Fiscella said the former sergeant was injured on the job in 1997 trying to arrest a suspect and sustained a back injury that led to "unbearable pain" he worked with for another nine years.

"Dependence upon prescription medication has become a serious problem in our society," Sgt. Fiscella said Tuesday.

"It's really a shame we failed to recognize that there was a problem."

The grand jury issued an indictment of 10 counts of unlawfully obtaining possession of a controlled substance, theft and two counts each of possession of cocaine, possession of a hypodermic needle and syringe and official misconduct. "As law enforcement officers, we place our trust in the criminal justice system," Sgt. Fiscella said." We have faith that the result will be fair and just."

As part of his suspension, Mr. Mullett had been required to turn over his service weapon and police identification and lost access to the Delaware Criminal Justice Information System.

During a May 19 press conference, state police Superintendent Col. Thomas F. MacLeish said the agency's response to the alleged crime "sends a clear public message that the Delaware State Police will not allow any member to tarnish the badge of the Delaware state trooper."

Sgt. Fiscella said he was "disappointed" by the comment.

Last week, a U.S. District Court jury in Wilmington found that Col. MacLeish and his predecessor, L. Aaron Chaffinch, violated the constitutional rights of three state troopers and awarded them nearly $2 million in damages.Col. MacLeish specifically was ordered to pay punitive damages totaling $131,032.

State police will request the Delaware Council on Police Training to commence de-certification proceedings against Mr. Mullett, agency spokeswoman Sgt. Melissa Zebley said.

The request follows agency protocol for a member who is under administrative investigation for "a breach of internal discipline for which he could have been legitimately discharged had he not resigned his position prior to an adverse finding of fact being entered on the issue by the employing agency."

Staff writer Drew Volturo can be reached at 741-8296 or dvolturo@newszap.com
http://www.newszap.com/articles/2006/06/06/dm/central_delaware/dsn04.tx

Religion and the Strawman

McCloud CA
Dateline 8-27-06

I am attempting to leave McCloud for the second day. This event has entered a serious transition of personnel. If one would base this on my age of 45 on August 3, in 15 years or 2021 fifteen years would have passed.

I believe that most perhaps two thirds of the personnel in LAPD and The Baltimore Studio would be dead, retired, or sick.

Narayana Maharaj is a Gaudiya Vaishnava diksa guru. He had emerged through the Gaudiya Math. He supports the homosexual devotee system to some degree. In Gaudiya Vaishnavism there are four rules:

No Meat eating
No illicit sex
No drugs
No gambling

I have read an article on his site purebhakti.com that if a devotee followed these rules there would be no problem.

I am a ritviks devotee and support that the Vedic conclusion is that heterosexuality is the only form sexlife that is sanctioned by Sri Krishna.

I have lived from May to the present here in Siskiyou County. Since the day I arrived I have totally advocated exposing the fraud that amounts to torture here. LAPD, The Baltimore Studio, and the Delaware State Police are the main movers. The harassment as the slamming of doors, being an informant as laying in wait at stores, and supporting the corrupt agents or stating that I do is abusive.

Aaron, Jim, and George of The Baltimore Studio all weigh now at over 280 lbs. Aaron is 284, Jim 293, and George 303.

The latter two also have heavy credit card debts that they had to ring up to cover their small marijuana growing. This is probably no bigger than a month to month closet setup.

The entire Baltimore Studio engages in such and will most likely never get arrested for such save maybe Escuche who weighs 225 lbs.

They will go bankrupt due to revolving credit. A $10,000 credit card balance at 18.50% will double in 3.89 years or almost 3 years 11 months. 72 divided by the rate will yield time.

The blackmail and extortion encompassed everyone in the surveillance. I do not do drugs and do not wish to be a local drug dealer. I do no idolize these figures from this location or another as Delaware.

The journal entries that began with May 2006 may be gathered and sent to California State officials and major media writers among others.

What is Neo-Fascism?

Alturas CA
Dateline 9-18-06

Hello ALL

Here are some interesting points to consider in arriving at what is neo-fascist. This related to the use of electronic surveillance and totalitarianism which you may have had direct experience.

Bottom line, are the neo-cons driving this agenda neo-fascist? Dr. Lawrence Britt, a political scientist, published research on fascism [18] in which he examined the fascist regimes of Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, Suharto and several Latin American regimes. Britt found 14 defining characteristics common to each fascist State:

1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism - Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.

2. Disdain for the recognition of Human Rights - Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of “need.” The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarceration of prisoners, etc.

3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause - The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial, ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists; terrorists, etc.

4. Supremacy of the Military - Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military are glamorized.

5. Rampant sexism - The government of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Divorce, abortion and homosexuality are suppressed and the state is represented as the ultimate guardian of the family institution.

6. Controlled Mass Media - Sometimes the media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.

7. Obsession with National security - Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses.

8. Religion and Government are intertwined - Government in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government’s policies or actions.

9. Corporate Power is Protected - The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation are often the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.

10. Labor Power is suppressed - Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated, or are severely restricted.

11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts - Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts and letters is openly attacked.

12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment - Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations.

13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption - Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders.

14. Fraudulent Elections - Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassinations of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections.

Benito Mussolini - who knew something about fascism - had a more straightforward definition: “Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power.”

Abraham Lincoln stated, “I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me, and causes me to tremble for the safety of our country. Corporations have been enthroned, an era of corruption will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people, until wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the republic is destroyed.”

The small, but ruthless, group of men, the “money power” described by Lincoln, has stolen democracy from the American people. An ever-growing number of informed Americans, however, are fighting a brave, but desperate rear-guard action to retrieve that democracy. Will we give them our total support now, or simply sit back and watch as the entire planet is taken back to the dark ages? “The only thing necessary for evil to flourish is for good men to do nothing.”

Jim Macgregor is a 57 year old retired doctor. For many years he was a family practitioner and visiting Medical Officer to Glenochil Prison, one of Scotland's high security prisons. Through his prison work, he developed a special interest in miscarriages of justice and is a member of the Miscarriage of Justice Organization. MOJO (Scotland). You can contact Jim at gairmoj@aol.com

This article was first published at www.surfaceonline.org

On Ed Bradley - 60 Minutes

Blythe CA
Dateline 11-26-06

The death of Ed Bradley, news journalist of 60 Minutes has brought accolades for his pioneering work. Bradley was 65 years of age and succumbed to leukemia.

According to himself he was a performer who could “play all the positions, hit for average and power”.

Bradley’s career encompassed nearly 26 years of 60 Minutes. The scorched earth event in the United States entitled AKBAR (there is a real name) has encompassed 19 years with a genesis on June 17, 1987. This is also the anniversary of the United States Constitution and the date of the breaking out of WATERGATE.

Mr. Bradley, 60 Minutes and the commercial media are nowhere to be seen in spite of their million dollar salaries.

Rush Limbaugh has just went on the air denying that he has “carried anybodies water” in the wake of the solid beating the Republicans and conservatives withstood in the recent midterm elections.

As with Peter Jennings, is Ed Bradley, is he “going along to get along or just GETTING ALONG”?

Mr. Bradley may of “played all the positions”. He did not “HIT FOR POWER”.

To this I say POWER REALITY.

Judge one by the hand and not by the mouth. History will teach that the largest domestic story of our times was purposely avoided by Ed Bradley. This is not taking the bull by the horns.

The demise of an elite journalist only focalizing the corruption on the media to profit and shape public opinion and advance one’s interest.

Material adapted from an article by Peter Johnson USAToday.

Kazakhstan Remedies Proposed for Krishnas

Blythe CA
Dateline 12-23-06

Special Commission Decision and Response
DECISION: of the Commission for investigation of the land issue of the Religious Organization "Society for Krishna Consciousness" in the Karasai district of Almaty province Having studied the current situation connected with land disputes of the Religious Organization (hereinafter - RO) "Society for Krishna Consciousness" in the Karasai district of the Almaty province and having listened to members of the producers' cooperative (hereinafter - PC) "Horticultural Association Ptitsevod," PC "Horticultural Association Priozerye," members of RO "Society for Krishna Consciousness" as well as representatives of the Karasai District Hakimat, territorial bodies of land resources management of Almaty province and Mr. B.B. Govinda Swami, the coordinator of RO "Society for Krishna Consciousness" in Central Asia, the Commission decided: 1. To recommend the Hakim of the Karasai district: 1) To solve disputable points on the usage of land plots and summer cottages on the territory of the Eltai rural district in accordance with the procedures established by the legislation of RK; 2) To take measures to exclude defects in the future work for the privatization of land plots in the Eltai rural district and the control over abidance by the requirements of land legislation and architectural and town-planning legislation of RK; 3) To continue the previously suspended privatization of cottages and horticultural plots of land taking into account the requirements of land legislation and architectural and town-planning legislation of RK; 2. To recommend the management of RO "Society of Krishna Consciousness": 1) To appeal to the local executive authorities of the Karasai district in accordance with the procedures established by legislation for allotment of a land plot to construct a place of worship; 2) To carry out public worship, religious rites and ceremonies according to the requirements of the Law of RK "On the Freedom of Faith and Religious Associations." 3) To present the problems of cooperation with the local authorities objectively while appealing to governmental bodies, international organizations and mass media. 3. To recommend the members of RO "Society for Krishna Consciousness" and PC "Horticultural Association Priozerye" that any disputable issues on the usage of land plots and cottages on the territory of the Eltai rural district of the Karasai district should be resolved in the order established by the legislation of RK. 4. To recommend that the Department of Justice of Almaty province and the Committee for Connections with Religious Organizations of the Almaty Provincial Hakimat should take into consideration the current situation and continuously control the observance of the law on the freedom of faith and religious associations by local bodies, religious associations, and other legal and physical entities in the Karasai district. Chairman of the Commission (signed) A. Mukhashov REPLY: Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Religious Affairs Department, A.M. Mukhashov copies: Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, USA Embassy in RK, United Kingdoms Embassy in RK, Netherlands Embassy in RK Kazakhstan International Bureau for Human Rights and Law Observance, Almaty Helsinki Committee Dear Mr. Mukhashov: I am in due receipt of your invitation to the meeting of the Commission for considering the land issue of the Religious Organization Society for Krishna Consciousness in the Karasai district, Almaty province, scheduled for December 22, 2006 (invitation letter No. 6-1-2/i-903 dated December 15, 2006). However, on December 16, 2006, I received the decision of the Commission with your signature, which has been distributed by the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (see the attached copy). I wish to call your attention to the fact that although I am a member of the named Commission, I have not been invited to take part in rendering this decision and never received an official decision of the Commission. As far as I understand, the independent observers who officially participated in the meetings of the Commission, namely representatives of OSCE, Kazakhstan International Bureau for Human Rights and Law Observance, Almaty Helsinki Committee, have also not received an official copy. Neither I, nor any other members of the Society for Krishna Consciousness, nor the observers, took part in meetings of the Commission to discuss the results of its investigation, to hear reports of its members, or to draw conclusions and pronounce a decision. As you know, no decision was announced during the previous meetings of the Commission attended by the members of the Commission and the observers and held on September 7 and 28, 2006, October 1 and 2, 2006. Nonetheless, the attached document seems to indicate that a decision was made without my participation as a member of the Commission. I would thus ask you to clarify the following questions before the meeting of December 22, 2006: 1. What is this decision? 2. Who made it and when? 3. Why were BB Govinda Swami (a member of the Commission) and the observers not invited to discuss and pronounce the decision? 4. Who discussed the results of the Commission’s investigation and when? 5. What are the documents studied by the Commission? Who studied them and when? What was the result of this study? 6. What are the conclusions of the Commission with respect to the ambulatory meeting and the activities of the Commission in general? 7. Considering the fact that the decision appears to already be made, what is the agenda of the meeting scheduled for December 22, 2006? The fact that a decision was made in my absence and that governmental bodies of the Republic of Kazakhstan distributed the decision of the Commission without having a meeting, raises questions as to the objectivity and fairness of the Commission. As a supposed member of the Commission, I am doubtful about the practical use of holding a meeting to discuss our issue, when you, the Commission’s chairman, have already prepared, signed and distributed the decision. In light of this ambiguity, I respectfully call on you as the chairman of the Commission to clarify the situation and answer my questions, before the meeting scheduled for December 22, 2006. Respectfully, BB Govinda Swami
http://www.palaceofthesoul.com/news/index.php?article_id=65
Written By: BB Govinda Swami	Date: 22 Dec 2006

BOOK II

1. THAT SOVEREIGNTY IS INALIENABLE

5. THE RIGHT OF LIFE AND DEATH

Special Commission Decision and Response